The Subtleties of Sulking
.
Tap an underlined Tamil word to explore its sound, meaning, and use.
peṇṇiyalā rellāruṅ kaṇṇiṟ potuvuṇpar / naṇṇēṉ parattaniṉ mārpu.
Every woman of womanly nature takes you in with her eyes, and takes you in common with the rest. I will not come near that chest of yours, you wanderer.
▸Other translations · Pope (1886) & Aiyar (1916)
“From thy regard all womankind Enjoys an equal grace; / O thou of wandering fickle mind, I shrink from thine embrace!”
“All that are women devour thee with their eyes, thou gallant! I shall have none of thy embrace.”
Parimelazhagar’s commentary
13th century · public domainParimelazhagar’s own words come first, unaltered. The plain reading follows below.
பரத்த= பரத்தமையுடையாய்; பெண்ணியலார் எல்லாரும் கண்ணிற் பொதுவுண்பர்= நின்னைப் பெண் இயல்பின் உடையார் யாவரும் தம் கண்ணால் பொதுவாக உண்பர்; நின்மார்பு நண்ணேன்= அதனால் அவர் மிச்சிலாய நின் மார்பினைப் பொருந்தேன், எ-று.
Source: Tamil Wikisource
Parimelazhagar breaks the couplet into three pieces and takes the vocative first. 'பரத்த = பரத்தமையுடையாய்' is his sentence: before anything else he settles that she is turning to the man and calling him one whose ways do not stay in one place. Only then does he come to the first line, which he reads as 'every one who has the nature of a woman consumes you in common with their own eyes.' He adds two words here. நின்னை, you, is not in the source; he supplies it so that the thing consumed is unmistakably the man. யாவரும், all of them, presses again on a word the couplet has already used. Finally he reaches the second line: 'therefore I do not come near your chest, which is their leavings.' The அதனால், therefore, is also his — the couplet sets two sentences side by side and it is the commentator who joins them as cause and consequence. But the sharpest thing in the whole reading is one word, மிச்சில், leavings, what is left over. The couplet contains only பொது, held in common. That what remains after a thing has been consumed in common is leavings is the inference Parimelazhagar draws, and it is worth recording plainly that the word is his and not the verse's.